🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of states are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion supporting a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," stated one MEP behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing online content suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly occurring at the state government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, further countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international debate continues, the steps of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.